1956 DKW Munga vs. 2009 Ford E-350
To start off, 2009 Ford E-350 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 DKW Munga would be higher. At 5,409 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1956 DKW Munga. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1956 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 DKW Munga weights approximately 314 kg more than 2009 Ford E-350.
Because 1956 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford E-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford E-350 (475 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 404 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 DKW Munga. (71 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 DKW Munga.
Compare all specifications:
1956 DKW Munga | 2009 Ford E-350 | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | Munga | E-350 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 896 cc | 5409 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 475 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3510 mm |