1956 DKW Universal vs. 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 DKW Universal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 DKW Universal would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste weights approximately 20 kg more than 1956 DKW Universal.
Because 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 DKW Universal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 DKW Universal | 1981 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | DKW | Mitsubishi |
Model | Universal | Celeste |
Year Released | 1956 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 894 cc | 1597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 945 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2350 mm |