1956 DKW Universal vs. 2000 Nissan R 390 GT1
To start off, 2000 Nissan R 390 GT1 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 DKW Universal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 DKW Universal would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Nissan R 390 GT1 weights approximately 173 kg more than 1956 DKW Universal.
Because 2000 Nissan R 390 GT1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Nissan R 390 GT1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 DKW Universal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 DKW Universal | 2000 Nissan R 390 GT1 | |
| Make | DKW | Nissan |
| Model | Universal | R 390 GT1 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 355 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1098 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2730 mm |
