1956 DKW Universal vs. 2002 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2002 Jeep Compass is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 DKW Universal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 DKW Universal would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jeep Compass weights approximately 481 kg more than 1956 DKW Universal.
Because 2002 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 DKW Universal. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Jeep Compass has automatic transmission and 1956 DKW Universal has manual transmission. 1956 DKW Universal will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jeep Compass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 DKW Universal | 2002 Jeep Compass | |
| Make | DKW | Jeep |
| Model | Universal | Compass |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 894 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1406 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2660 mm |
