1956 DKW Universal vs. 2009 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 DKW Universal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 DKW Universal would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Mustang weights approximately 185 kg more than 1956 DKW Universal.
Because 2009 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 DKW Universal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 DKW Universal | 2009 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | Universal | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 894 cc | 4606 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 300 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2730 mm |
