1956 Fiat 1400 vs. 1969 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1969 Ford Fairlane is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Fiat 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Fiat 1400 would be higher. At 2,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Ford Fairlane (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1956 Fiat 1400. (53 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1956 Fiat 1400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 145 kg more than 1956 Fiat 1400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Fiat 1400 | 1969 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | 1400 | Fairlane |
Year Released | 1956 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1394 cc | 2781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 40 L |