1956 Fiat 1400 vs. 1993 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 1993 Ford Aerostar is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Fiat 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Fiat 1400 would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Ford Aerostar (143 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1956 Fiat 1400. (49 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 1956 Fiat 1400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 285 kg more than 1956 Fiat 1400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Fiat 1400 | 1993 Ford Aerostar | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | 1400 | Aerostar |
Year Released | 1956 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1395 cc | 2979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3030 mm |