1956 Fiat 1400 vs. 1996 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1996 Ford Mustang is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Fiat 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Fiat 1400 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (350 HP) has 301 more horse power than 1956 Fiat 1400. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1956 Fiat 1400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Mustang weights approximately 220 kg more than 1956 Fiat 1400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Fiat 1400 | 1996 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | 1400 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1956 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1395 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 350 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1345 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2580 mm |