1956 Fiat 1400 vs. 2003 Ford F-250
To start off, 2003 Ford F-250 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Fiat 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Fiat 1400 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford F-250 (296 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1956 Fiat 1400. (49 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1956 Fiat 1400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford F-250 weights approximately 1285 kg more than 1956 Fiat 1400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Fiat 1400 | 2003 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | 1400 | F-250 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1395 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 2410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 5760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 144 L |