1956 Fiat 1400 vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Fiat 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Fiat 1400 would be higher. At 1,395 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Fiat 1400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1956 Fiat 1400. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1956 Fiat 1400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Fiat 1400 weights approximately 385 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Fiat 1400 | 2004 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Fiat | MCC |
Model | 1400 | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1956 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 1395 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 1810 mm |