1956 Fiat 1400 vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Fiat 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Fiat 1400 would be higher. At 1,395 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Fiat 1400 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Fiat 1400 weights approximately 70 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Because 1956 Fiat 1400 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Fiat 1400. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Fiat 1400 | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Fiat | Renault |
Model | 1400 | Clio |
Year Released | 1956 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 1395 cc | 1390 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 50 L |