1956 Fiat 1400 vs. 2009 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2009 Nissan Pixo is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Fiat 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Fiat 1400 would be higher. At 1,900 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Fiat 1400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Pixo (68 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1956 Fiat 1400. (38 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Pixo should accelerate faster than 1956 Fiat 1400.
Because 1956 Fiat 1400 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Fiat 1400. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Fiat 1400 | 2009 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | 1400 | Pixo |
Year Released | 1956 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1900 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2360 mm |