1956 Fiat 1600 vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1983 Ford Ranger is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Fiat 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Fiat 1600 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Fiat 1600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Fiat 1600 | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | 1600 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1956 | 1983 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1589 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4690 mm |