1956 Fiat 1600 vs. 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod
To start off, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Fiat 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Fiat 1600 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1956 Fiat 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Fiat 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Fiat 1600 | 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | 1600 | XR 8 Xplod |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1589 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 469 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2620 mm |
