1956 Fiat 1600 vs. 2002 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2002 Ford Windstar is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Fiat 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Fiat 1600 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1956 Fiat 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Fiat 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Fiat 1600 | 2002 Ford Windstar | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | 1600 | Windstar |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1589 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 5103 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1946 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3066 mm |
