1956 Fiat 1600 vs. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Fiat 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Fiat 1600 would be higher. At 4,396 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Fiat 1600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1956 Fiat 1600 has manual transmission. 1956 Fiat 1600 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Fiat 1600 | 2003 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Fiat | Land Rover |
Model | 1600 | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1956 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1589 cc | 4396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 282 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 2200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2890 mm |