1956 Fiat 1900 vs. 1991 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1991 Ford Mustang is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Fiat 1900. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Fiat 1900 would be higher. At 2,301 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Ford Mustang (106 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1956 Fiat 1900. (79 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1956 Fiat 1900. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Ford Mustang weights approximately 15 kg more than 1956 Fiat 1900. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Fiat 1900 | 1991 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | 1900 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1956 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1901 cc | 2301 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2560 mm |