1956 Fiat Campagnola vs. 1980 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1980 Toyota Celica is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 2,366 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Toyota Celica (96 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1956 Fiat Campagnola. (36 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1956 Fiat Campagnola.
Because 1956 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Toyota Celica (175 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Fiat Campagnola. (122 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1980 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Fiat Campagnola.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Fiat Campagnola | 1980 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Fiat | Toyota |
Model | Campagnola | Celica |
Year Released | 1956 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 2366 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 122 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2510 mm |