1956 Fiat Campagnola vs. 1998 Ford Contour
To start off, 1998 Ford Contour is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 2,544 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Ford Contour is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Contour (195 HP @ 6625 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1956 Fiat Campagnola. (36 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Contour should accelerate faster than 1956 Fiat Campagnola.
Because 1956 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Ford Contour. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Ford Contour (224 Nm @ 5625 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Fiat Campagnola. (122 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1998 Ford Contour will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Fiat Campagnola.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Fiat Campagnola | 1998 Ford Contour | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Campagnola | Contour |
Year Released | 1956 | 1998 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 2544 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 6625 RPM |
Torque | 122 Nm | 224 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 5625 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 82.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 20.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2730 mm |