1956 Fiat Campagnola vs. 2004 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2004 Ford Taurus is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Taurus (200 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1956 Fiat Campagnola. (36 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1956 Fiat Campagnola.
Because 1956 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Ford Taurus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Taurus (281 Nm) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Fiat Campagnola. (122 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Fiat Campagnola.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Fiat Campagnola | 2004 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Campagnola | Taurus |
Year Released | 1956 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 122 Nm | 281 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 89.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 20.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2620 mm |