1956 Fiat Campagnola vs. 2004 MCC ForTwo
To start off, 2004 MCC ForTwo is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Fiat Campagnola is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MCC ForTwo (49 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1956 Fiat Campagnola. (36 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 MCC ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1956 Fiat Campagnola.
Because 1956 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 MCC ForTwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Fiat Campagnola (122 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC ForTwo. (80 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1956 Fiat Campagnola will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Fiat Campagnola | 2004 MCC ForTwo | |
Make | Fiat | MCC |
Model | Campagnola | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1956 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 122 Nm | 80 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 1810 mm |