1956 Fiat Campagnola vs. 2005 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1956 Fiat Campagnola. (36 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1956 Fiat Campagnola.
Because 1956 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1956 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mustang (326 Nm) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Fiat Campagnola. (122 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Fiat Campagnola.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Fiat Campagnola | 2005 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Campagnola | Mustang |
Year Released | 1956 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 4015 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 122 Nm | 326 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 84 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2620 mm |