1956 Ford 12 M vs. 1952 Triumph Mayflower
To start off, 1956 Ford 12 M is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 1,247 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Triumph Mayflower is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 37 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Ford 12 M | 1952 Triumph Mayflower | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | 12 M | Mayflower |
Year Released | 1956 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1247 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2140 mm |