1956 Ford 12 M vs. 1987 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1987 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,172 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Ford 12 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Volkswagen Polo (44 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1956 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1987 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1956 Ford 12 M.
Because 1956 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Ford 12 M | 1987 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
Model | 12 M | Polo |
Year Released | 1956 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1043 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2340 mm |