1956 Ford 12 M vs. 1992 Renault 19
To start off, 1992 Renault 19 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,172 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Ford 12 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Renault 19 (57 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1956 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Renault 19 should accelerate faster than 1956 Ford 12 M.
Because 1956 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Renault 19, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Ford 12 M | 1992 Renault 19 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | 12 M | 19 |
Year Released | 1956 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1171 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2550 mm |