1956 Ford 12 M vs. 1996 Volvo 440
To start off, 1996 Volvo 440 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,594 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Volvo 440 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Volvo 440 (83 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1956 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Volvo 440 should accelerate faster than 1956 Ford 12 M.
Because 1956 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Volvo 440, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Ford 12 M | 1996 Volvo 440 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | 12 M | 440 |
Year Released | 1956 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2510 mm |