1956 Ford 12 M vs. 2000 Honda Capa
To start off, 2000 Honda Capa is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,493 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Honda Capa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Honda Capa (97 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1956 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Honda Capa should accelerate faster than 1956 Ford 12 M.
Because 1956 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda Capa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Honda Capa has automatic transmission and 1956 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1956 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Honda Capa will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Ford 12 M | 2000 Honda Capa | |
| Make | Ford | Honda |
| Model | 12 M | Capa |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1493 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 37 HP | 97 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2370 mm |
