1956 Ford 12 M vs. 2001 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2001 Lincoln LS is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 3,950 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lincoln LS (252 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 215 more horse power than 1956 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1956 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Lincoln LS has automatic transmission and 1956 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1956 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Lincoln LS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Ford 12 M | 2001 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Ford | Lincoln |
Model | 12 M | LS |
Year Released | 1956 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2910 mm |