1956 Ford 12 M vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Ford 12 M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo has automatic transmission and 1956 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1956 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Ford 12 M | 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | 12 M | Dingo |
Year Released | 1956 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2450 mm |