1956 Ford 12 M vs. 2004 Renault Grand Scenic
To start off, 2004 Renault Grand Scenic is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Renault Grand Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Renault Grand Scenic (133 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1956 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Renault Grand Scenic should accelerate faster than 1956 Ford 12 M.
Because 1956 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Renault Grand Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Ford 12 M | 2004 Renault Grand Scenic | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | 12 M | Grand Scenic |
Year Released | 1956 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2570 mm |