1956 Ford 12 M vs. 2008 Volkswagen Caddy
To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Caddy is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Volkswagen Caddy is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Volkswagen Caddy (108 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1956 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Volkswagen Caddy should accelerate faster than 1956 Ford 12 M.
Because 1956 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volkswagen Caddy, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Ford 12 M | 2008 Volkswagen Caddy | |
Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
Model | 12 M | Caddy |
Year Released | 1956 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2690 mm |