1956 Ford 12 M vs. 2010 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2010 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1956 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1956 Ford 12 M.
Because 1956 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Mazda CX-7 has automatic transmission and 1956 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1956 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mazda CX-7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Ford 12 M | 2010 Mazda CX-7 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | 12 M | CX-7 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 244 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4681 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1646 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2751 mm |