1956 Ford 12 M vs. 2010 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volkswagen Polo (104 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1956 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1956 Ford 12 M.
Because 1956 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Ford 12 M | 2010 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
Model | 12 M | Polo |
Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1172 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 37 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1682 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1462 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2470 mm |