1956 Ford Consul vs. 2009 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2009 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford Consul. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford Consul would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1956 Ford Consul. (51 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1956 Ford Consul.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Ford Consul. (127 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Ford Consul.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Ford Consul | 2009 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Consul | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1956 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1703 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 127 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 65 L |