1956 Ford F vs. 1982 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1982 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford F. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford F would be higher. At 4,458 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Ford F is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Ford F (156 HP) has 117 more horse power than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. (39 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Ford F should accelerate faster than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Ford F weights approximately 1331 kg more than 1982 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 Ford F is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Ford F. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Ford F | 1982 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
Model | F | Polo |
Year Released | 1956 | 1982 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4458 cc | 1043 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 39 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2046 kg | 715 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2340 mm |