1956 Ford F vs. 1999 Mazda 626
To start off, 1999 Mazda 626 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford F. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford F would be higher. At 4,458 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Ford F is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Ford F (156 HP @ 3000 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1999 Mazda 626. (101 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Ford F should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Ford F weights approximately 706 kg more than 1999 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 Ford F is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Ford F. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Ford F | 1999 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | F | 626 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4458 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 156 HP | 101 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2046 kg | 1340 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2680 mm |
