1956 Ford F vs. 2000 Mazda 626
To start off, 2000 Mazda 626 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford F. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford F would be higher. At 4,458 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Ford F is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Ford F (156 HP @ 3000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2000 Mazda 626. (100 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Ford F should accelerate faster than 2000 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Ford F weights approximately 660 kg more than 2000 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Mazda 626 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Ford F. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda 626 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Ford F | 2000 Mazda 626 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | F | 626 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4458 cc | 2496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 156 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2046 kg | 1386 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2620 mm |
