1956 Ford F vs. 2002 Toyota ES 3
To start off, 2002 Toyota ES 3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford F. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford F would be higher. At 4,458 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Ford F is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Ford F weights approximately 1346 kg more than 2002 Toyota ES 3.
Because 1956 Ford F is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Ford F. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota ES 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Ford F | 2002 Toyota ES 3 | |
| Make | Ford | Toyota |
| Model | F | ES 3 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4458 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 156 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2046 kg | 700 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2320 mm |
