1956 Ford F vs. 2002 Volvo C70
To start off, 2002 Volvo C70 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford F. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford F would be higher. At 4,458 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Ford F is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo C70 (162 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1956 Ford F. (156 HP @ 3000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1956 Ford F. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Ford F weights approximately 646 kg more than 2002 Volvo C70.
Because 1956 Ford F is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Ford F. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Ford F | 2002 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | F | C70 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2002 |
Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4458 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 162 HP |
Engine RPM | 3000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2046 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2670 mm |