1956 Ford Fairlane vs. 1968 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1968 Suzuki Fronte is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,783 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 760 kg more than 1968 Suzuki Fronte.
Because 1956 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Suzuki Fronte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Ford Fairlane | 1968 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | Fairlane | Fronte |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 4783 cc | 785 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 35 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 760 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2210 mm |
