1956 Ford Fairlane vs. 1995 Mitsubishi Verada
To start off, 1995 Mitsubishi Verada is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,783 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 2 kg more than 1995 Mitsubishi Verada.
Because 1956 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mitsubishi Verada, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Ford Fairlane | 1995 Mitsubishi Verada | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Fairlane | Verada |
Year Released | 1956 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4783 cc | 2972 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 161 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1518 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2730 mm |