1956 Ford Fairlane vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,783 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 290 kg more than 1956 Ford Fairlane.
Because 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Ford Fairlane | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Fairlane | Challenger |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4783 cc | 2835 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 138 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1810 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2730 mm |
