1956 Ford Fairlane vs. 2000 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 2000 Toyota Corolla is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,783 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 340 kg more than 2000 Toyota Corolla.
Because 2000 Toyota Corolla is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Corolla will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Ford Fairlane | 2000 Toyota Corolla | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Fairlane | Corolla |
Year Released | 1956 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4783 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1180 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2510 mm |