1956 Ford Fairlane vs. 2001 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2001 Ford Ranger is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,783 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Ranger weights approximately 320 kg more than 1956 Ford Fairlane.
Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Ford Fairlane | 2001 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Fairlane | Ranger |
Year Released | 1956 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4783 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1840 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 3010 mm |