1956 Ford Fairlane vs. 2005 Seat Alhambra
To start off, 2005 Seat Alhambra is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,783 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Seat Alhambra weights approximately 180 kg more than 1956 Ford Fairlane.
Because 1956 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Seat Alhambra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Ford Fairlane | 2005 Seat Alhambra | |
| Make | Ford | Seat |
| Model | Fairlane | Alhambra |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4783 cc | 2792 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 201 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1700 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2850 mm |
