1956 Ford Fairlane vs. 2006 Subaru B9 Tribeca
To start off, 2006 Subaru B9 Tribeca is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,783 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Subaru B9 Tribeca weights approximately 113 kg more than 1956 Ford Fairlane.
Because 2006 Subaru B9 Tribeca is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Subaru B9 Tribeca will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Ford Fairlane | 2006 Subaru B9 Tribeca | |
| Make | Ford | Subaru |
| Model | Fairlane | B9 Tribeca |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4783 cc | 2999 cc |
| Engine Type | V | boxer |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 250 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1633 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2750 mm |
