1956 Ford Prefect vs. 2011 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2011 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford Prefect. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford Prefect would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1956 Ford Prefect. (31 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1956 Ford Prefect.
Because 2011 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Ford Prefect. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 309 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Ford Prefect. (71 Nm @ 2150 RPM). This means 2011 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Ford Prefect.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Ford Prefect | 2011 Mazda BT-50 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Prefect | BT-50 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1172 cc | 2953 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 31 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Torque | 71 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2150 RPM | 180 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 63.5 mm | 96.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92.5 mm | 102 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 3010 mm |
