1956 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1941 Simca 8
To start off, 1956 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Simca 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Simca 8 would be higher. At 5,112 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Ford Thunderbird (223 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1941 Simca 8. (33 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1941 Simca 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 590 kg more than 1941 Simca 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Ford Thunderbird | 1941 Simca 8 | |
Make | Ford | Simca |
Model | Thunderbird | 8 |
Year Released | 1956 | 1941 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5112 cc | 1090 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2430 mm |