1956 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1952 Ford Crestline
To start off, 1956 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 5,112 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Ford Thunderbird (223 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1952 Ford Crestline. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford Crestline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 30 kg more than 1952 Ford Crestline. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Ford Thunderbird | 1952 Ford Crestline | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Thunderbird | Crestline |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5112 cc | 3929 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2940 mm |
