1956 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1973 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 1973 Mazda RX-3 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,784 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Ford Thunderbird (209 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1973 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1973 Mazda RX-3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 618 kg more than 1973 Mazda RX-3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Ford Thunderbird | 1973 Mazda RX-3 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Thunderbird | RX-3 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4784 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 209 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 852 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2320 mm |
